<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Schein &#38; Cai LLP &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog</link>
	<description>Serving Silicon Valley &#38; Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Non Compete Agreements For California Employees Are Generally Unenforceable</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/non-compete-agreements-for-california-employees-are-generally-unenforceable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/non-compete-agreements-for-california-employees-are-generally-unenforceable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employers often require that new employees sign a slew of documents to protect the interests of the employer. These may include, among other things, a non-compete agreement. Non compete agreements, properly structured, are enforceable in most states. But in California non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable based on court decisions (Edwards v. Arthur Andersen, a 2008 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/non-compete-agreements-for-california-employees-are-generally-unenforceable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Retailer Amazon Works Hard To Avoid State Sales Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/online-retailer-amazon-works-hard-to-avoid-state-sales-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/online-retailer-amazon-works-hard-to-avoid-state-sales-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The giant online retailer Amazon has ended its relationships with California based affiliates who funnel customers their way over concern that a new State law could force it to pay sales tax on all purchases made by California residents. What the average person may not know is the lengths to which Amazon has gone since [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/online-retailer-amazon-works-hard-to-avoid-state-sales-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP vs. Oracle: Battle Of The High-Tech Titans</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/hp-vs-oracle-battle-of-the-high-tech-titans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/hp-vs-oracle-battle-of-the-high-tech-titans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It makes great copy when business litigation pits a David vs. a Goliath. A small upstart company, toiling away in its hometown, unknown to the world, becomes the target of a huge multinational player, or sues the huge company, claiming that the practices or actions of the household name have damaged it through use of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/hp-vs-oracle-battle-of-the-high-tech-titans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Shirt Manufacturer Prevails Over Chrysler in First Stage Of Trademark Case</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/t-shirt-manufacturer-prevails-over-chrysler-in-first-stage-of-trademark-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/t-shirt-manufacturer-prevails-over-chrysler-in-first-stage-of-trademark-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 01:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pittsburgh Steelers may have lost Super Bowl XLV to the Green Bay Packers on February 6, 2011, but they weren’t the only ones to suffer a big loss based on their performance that day. Chrysler, the Detroit automaker, unveiled a new marketing slogan in its Super Bowl ads: “Imported From Detroit”. Within days, a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/t-shirt-manufacturer-prevails-over-chrysler-in-first-stage-of-trademark-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLEVER MARKETING CAMPAIGN OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT?</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/clever-marketing-campaign-or-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/clever-marketing-campaign-or-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CLEVER MARKETING CAMPAIGN OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT? The first trailer for the upcoming movie, The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (US remake), hit the web on Sunday June 29, 2011 shortly after it appeared in European cinemas. The trailer begins with a few seconds of a shaky frame, as if someone sitting in the front row [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/clever-marketing-campaign-or-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customer Review from Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/customer-review-from-cynthia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/customer-review-from-cynthia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Customer Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Client Testimony: My sister and I were defendants in a civil litigation case. We hired James Cai and his law firm, Schein &#38; Cai LLP. Mr. Cai is a diligent attorney and responded to our questions in a timely fashion. He and his staff were very helpful in keeping us informed of the proceedings [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/customer-review-from-cynthia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS NEED FOR CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE TO REBUT PRESUMPTION THAT A PREVIOUSLY ISSUED PATENT IS VALID</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/us-supreme-court-upholds-need-for-clear-and-convincing-evidence-to-rebut-presumption-that-a-previously-issued-patent-is-valid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/us-supreme-court-upholds-need-for-clear-and-convincing-evidence-to-rebut-presumption-that-a-previously-issued-patent-is-valid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS NEED FOR CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE TO REBUT PRESUMPTION THAT A PREVIOUSLY ISSUED PATENT IS VALID The US Supreme court has confirmed that “clear and convincing evidence” is required to rebut the presumption that a previously issued patent is valid, issuing an 8-0 decision on June 9, 2011. The decision came [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/us-supreme-court-upholds-need-for-clear-and-convincing-evidence-to-rebut-presumption-that-a-previously-issued-patent-is-valid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schein &amp; Cai LLP is honored to announce that it is named as one of the Top U.S. Patent Firms for 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/schein-cai-llp-is-honored-to-announce-that-it-is-named-as-one-of-the-top-u-s-patent-firms-for-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/schein-cai-llp-is-honored-to-announce-that-it-is-named-as-one-of-the-top-u-s-patent-firms-for-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 03:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[April 13, 2011 (San Jose, California) – Schein &#038; Cai LLP is honored to announce that it is named as one of the Top U.S. Patent Firms for 2010 by Intellectual Property Today® (www.iptoday.com). The law firms are ranked according to the number of patents issued in 2010 where the firm or individual attorney is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/schein-cai-llp-is-honored-to-announce-that-it-is-named-as-one-of-the-top-u-s-patent-firms-for-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal trademark infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/federal-trademark-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/federal-trademark-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 07:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May 2, 2010, San Jose Schein &#38; Cai LLP achieved an early stage favorable settlement for its client, an on-line ecommerce retailer in a Federal trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit filed by a major manufacturer in Federal District Court for the Northern District of California.  Our firm took a proactive and practical approach during [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/federal-trademark-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Living Trust Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/living-trust-basics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/living-trust-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 07:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/?p=483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would happen if you and your spouse got into an accident and ended up unable to speak for yourselves, pay your bills, make your own investment decisions?  What will happen to all the assets you&#8217;ve accumulated after you&#8217;re gone? There are several ways to handle these matters, one of which is a Living Trust.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sacattorneys.com/legalblog/living-trust-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
