20th Anniversary SAC Attorneys
Elite Lawyers
Lawyers of Distinction
Avvo Rating 10.0
Santa Clara County Bar Association
Association of American Trial Lawyers
Elite Lawyers Business James Cai 2017
Best Litigation Attorneys in San Jose
Expertise - Best Employment Lawyers in Santa Clara 2021
Expertise - Best Employment Lawyers in Santa Clara 2022

How Can an Employer Defend Themselves Against Allegations of Workplace Discrimination?

Employers in California can be faced with allegations of workplace discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex, age, marital status, and other protected characteristics. Claims of workplace discrimination must be taken seriously. If you are facing allegations of workplace discrimination, it is vital that you consult an experienced employment attorney. Several defenses may be available for use in your case. A skilled attorney can help you identify the defenses available in your case and develop a strong defense strategy.

Below we discuss some potential defenses to allegations of workplace discrimination in California.

Defense #1: Bona Fide Occupational Qualification

This defense exists under section 703 (e)(1) of Title VII. According to the law, in some rare circumstances, an individual’s religion, sex, or national origin may be reasonably necessary for a particular job. You are allowed to assert this defense if a bona fide occupational qualification was legitimately the reason you made the decision that hurt the plaintiff. For example, the bona fide occupational qualification defense may apply if you did not hire an applicant because you have a factual basis for believing that all or substantially all workers of a specific sex cannot safely and effectively perform the job duties.

Defense #2: Business Necessity

Suppose an employer’s practice that seems neutral disproportionately harms people of a protected class. In such a case, workers may sue for disparate impact discrimination. If your practice is found to have such an impact, you can avoid liability if you can prove that the challenged discriminatory practice is required by “business necessity.” To prove business necessity, you must provide evidence that shows your employment and hiring practices are strictly related to job performance.

Defense #3: Employee Job Performance

If, for example, you fired an employee who falls into one or more protected classes because of the employee’s job performance, you may have a valid defense against the discrimination claims. As an employer, you have the right to discharge an employee who does not meet the standards of performance required or cannot function in the manner expected. This is true even if the employee falls into one or more protected classes.

To establish this defense, you need documentation of the employee’s performance reviews, warnings, attendance rates, and other evidence showing poor performance.

Defense #4: Breach of Contract

If, for example, you fired an employee based on contractual violations, you may have a valid defense against the allegations. This defense may also be available for use in your case if you took adverse employment action against an employee based on another employment-related contract.

Defense #5: Reasonable Factor Other Than Age

Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), this defense is available for disparate impact claims. It is available for claims that policies that appear facially neutral have a substantially greater impact on older workers than on younger workers. For instance, this defense may apply to a neutral test, such as a physical fitness test used to screen workers, if that test had a disparate impact on an older worker.

Contact a Skilled Employment Attorney in San Francisco

If you are facing allegations of workplace discrimination in California and need legal help, contact an experienced employment attorney in San Francisco at SAC Attorneys LLP. We can help you develop a strong defense strategy that can help you fight the claims.

Client Reviews
Mr. Cai Is a Diligent Attorney. My sister and I were defendants in a civil litigation case. We hired James Cai and his law firm, SAC Attorneys LLP. Mr. Cai is a diligent attorney and responded to our questions in a timely fashion. He and his staff were very helpful in keeping us informed of the proceedings of the case and in explaining each step. Mr. Cai is also very conscientious of fees and costs, and avoided unnecessary charges. The results of the Summary Adjudication sided with us. The Court Trial resulted in the “Final Statement of Decision” and “Judgment after Court Trial” overwhelmingly siding with us. Cynthia F.
I Am Truly Impressed. After spending a significant amount of time, money and efforts with my previous counsel at a larger law firm without getting meaningful results, I transferred my employment matter to SAC Attorneys LLP. The attorneys there were able to understand the complex situations of my case and put together an aggressive litigation strategy. We were able to file a compelling complaint within a week and forced the opposing party, which was represented by one of the largest law firms in California, to make a substantial settlement offer shortly thereafter. I am truly impressed by the no nonsense and results oriented approach by SAC Attorneys LLP attorneys. A job well done! X. Gao
They Took Time to Understand Our Technology. I am the founder of a bioinformatics start-up in the Silicon Valley and chose SAC Attorneys LLP as our corporate counsels. Their attorneys have great experience with high tech start-ups and were able to offer a highly competitive service plan while not sacrificing a bit of their quality of services. They took time to understand our technology and provided value added services by introducing investors and job candidates to us. We regard our attorneys at SAC Attorneys LLP not only as our legal advisors but also our venture partners. Dr. Pete S.