20th Anniversary SAC Attorneys
Elite Lawyers
Lawyers of Distinction
Avvo Rating 10.0
Santa Clara County Bar Association
Association of American Trial Lawyers
Elite Lawyers Business James Cai 2017
Best Litigation Attorneys in San Jose
Expertise - Best Employment Lawyers in Santa Clara 2021
Expertise - Best Employment Lawyers in Santa Clara 2022

Piercing the Corporate Veil in California

Corporations are legal entities that shield shareholders, which are the true owners of a corporation, from potential losses, except any monetary investment in the company. For example, if Joe Investor seeks to invest in a company, he buys its stock on the open market. He does not have any connection with the company outside of the stock purchase. If the company is sued for any number of things or has to declare bankruptcy, Mr. Investor loses only his initial investment.

As is common in many small businesses if the shareholder, owner and principal decision maker disregards the various necessities of corporate form, such as by commingling personal and corporate funds, the owner may lose the protections that the corporate form provides and they may lose more than the initial monetary investment in the corporation and be held personally liable on the debts of the corporation. The legal principle of piercing the corporate veil enables shareholder litigation, or others who have a valid debt with the corporation, to pass the liability through to the shareholder who is operating the corporation as their corporate alter ego. The use of a corporate form as an alter ego is but one means of piercing the veil.

Avoiding Legal Issues Within a Corporation

It can be rather difficult in fact to actually pierce the corporate veil. The corporate principal must essentially treat the corporation as an alter ego, or a mere instrumentality of the corporate principal, designed to defraud creditors to lose the protections of the corporate form. If the principal actually engages in a legitimate business, without commingling personal and corporate funds, there should be little problem. Personal bills should not be paid for via the corporate accounts. There should be separate bank accounts, utility accounts, credit card accounts, et cetera. Corporate funds should pay corporate bills. The money should flow from one bank account to another, and the personal bill paid for out of the personal account.

In addition, all business should be done under the corporate name. It is not uncommon for creditors to ask for both a corporate as well as personal guarantee; this should not be a violation of the prohibition against commingling, as there is a clear delineation of the two different legal entities.

Maintaining a legal firewall between the two entities, thus defeating an attempt to pierce the corporate veil, can only be strengthened by creating an operating agreement, which notes the shareholders, the percentage of ownership of each, along with maintenance of key corporate documents, recording of regular corporate meetings and similar required formalities. Finally, it is always best to conduct business on letterhead, with the position of the different parties delineated on the signature line.

Contact the Silicon Valley Business Lawyers at SAC Attorneys

If you have questions as a shareholder or as a corporate representative, you need an experienced attorney to help guide you. The lawyers of SAC Attorneys have represented shareholders, principals, and corporations for years. We serve clients throughout Silicon Valley. Call today to schedule a comprehensive consultation. Contact us today to schedule your consultation.

Client Reviews
Mr. Cai Is a Diligent Attorney. My sister and I were defendants in a civil litigation case. We hired James Cai and his law firm, SAC Attorneys LLP. Mr. Cai is a diligent attorney and responded to our questions in a timely fashion. He and his staff were very helpful in keeping us informed of the proceedings of the case and in explaining each step. Mr. Cai is also very conscientious of fees and costs, and avoided unnecessary charges. The results of the Summary Adjudication sided with us. The Court Trial resulted in the “Final Statement of Decision” and “Judgment after Court Trial” overwhelmingly siding with us. Cynthia F.
I Am Truly Impressed. After spending a significant amount of time, money and efforts with my previous counsel at a larger law firm without getting meaningful results, I transferred my employment matter to SAC Attorneys LLP. The attorneys there were able to understand the complex situations of my case and put together an aggressive litigation strategy. We were able to file a compelling complaint within a week and forced the opposing party, which was represented by one of the largest law firms in California, to make a substantial settlement offer shortly thereafter. I am truly impressed by the no nonsense and results oriented approach by SAC Attorneys LLP attorneys. A job well done! X. Gao
They Took Time to Understand Our Technology. I am the founder of a bioinformatics start-up in the Silicon Valley and chose SAC Attorneys LLP as our corporate counsels. Their attorneys have great experience with high tech start-ups and were able to offer a highly competitive service plan while not sacrificing a bit of their quality of services. They took time to understand our technology and provided value added services by introducing investors and job candidates to us. We regard our attorneys at SAC Attorneys LLP not only as our legal advisors but also our venture partners. Dr. Pete S.